Replies : 3 Last Post : December 16, 2021 (Thu) 22:10:23

549

Elastic constants

Posted on : December 16, 2021 (Thu) 18:01:21

by Ivan Lobzenko

Dear AkaiKKR users and developers!

I've started using AkaiKKR only recently and ran into a problem with the calculation of elastic constants. Originally I was dealing with an multi-element alloy, but to check my understanding of AkaiKKR I turned to a test example, which is single Mo BCC crystal.

Let me explain a little bit what I am doing.

The routine is simple, I am calculating energies of structures under different transformations and then getting coefficients from fitting of the energy curve with a polynomial (mostly of the order 2). To check results I do it in AkaiKKR and in VASP for the very same structures.

So, in both VASP and AkaiKKR I got more or less same results for bulk modulus and the elastic coefficients C11 and C12, but the shear modulus differs unreasonably. It is actually three times larger in AkaiKKR than in VASP:

VASP Mo B0 = 263.81 [GPa]
VASP Mo c11 = 471.67 [GPa]
VASP Mo c12 = 166.81 [GPa]
VASP Mo c44 = 88.27 [GPa]

AkaiKKR Mo B0 = 227.96 [GPa]
AkaiKKR Mo c11 = 441.57 [GPa]
AkaiKKR Mo c12 = 121.15 [GPa]
AkaiKKR Mo c44 = 458.89 [GPa] <--- ????

I checked a lot of various parts of the process, but cannot find the source of that misfit.

Here is one of my input files.
It is BCC under a monoclinic transformation with 10% value of transformation parameter (d).
The matrix for the transformation is Tm = [[1,d,0], [d,1,0], [0,0,1/(1-d^2)]]
===========================================================
c--------------------Mo--------------------------------------
go data/Mo
c------------------------------------------------------------
c brvtyp a c/a b/a alpha beta gamma
trc 6.02764, 1.0051, 1.0000, 90.0000, 90.0000, 78.5788,
c------------------------------------------------------------
c edelt ewidth reltyp sdftyp magtyp record
0.0010 0.80000 nrl pbe nmag 2nd
c------------------------------------------------------------
c outtyp bzqlty maxitr pmix
update 8 1000 0.0400
c------------------------------------------------------------
c ntyp
1
c------------------------------------------------------------
c type ncmp rmt field mxl anclr conc
Mo 1 1 0.0000 4
42 100
c------------------------------------------------------------
c natm
2
c------------------------------------------------------------
c atmicx atmtyp
0a 0b 0c Mo
1/2a 1/2b 1/2c Mo
c------------------------------------------------------------
===========================================================

If anyone can suggest what might be wrong, please share ideas!

 
 

552

[Re:03] Elastic constants

Posted on : December 17, 2021 (Fri) 16:27:02

by Hitoshi GOMI

Hello Ivan Lobzenko,

They are developing a full potential KKR-CPA.
If you are proficient in using the public version of AkaiKKR, you may use the development version by contacting the developers.

Hitoshi GOMI

 
 

551

[Re:02] Elastic constants

Posted on : December 16, 2021 (Thu) 23:24:04

by Ivan Lobzenko

Dear Hitoshi-san!

Thank you for such a swift response! That is a bit unfortunate that AkaiKKR cannot be used for elastic constants...

Do you think we should confirm that with developers directly?

Ivan Lobzenko

 
 

550

[Re:01] Elastic constants

Posted on : December 16, 2021 (Thu) 22:10:23

by Hitoshi GOMI

Hello Ivan Lobzenko,

I am facing the same problem.
I have calculated the elastic constants for fcc Al, but the C44 deviates significantly from the literature value.
AkaiKKR use a spherically symmetric approximation (MT or ASA), so I guess it is not suitable for calculating the elastic constants.

I would also like to know if you find any way to make it work.

Hitoshi GOMI

 
 

POST NEW TOPIC

ID (Email)

Password

このたび、AkaiKKRのページをセキュリティ対策の一環として、システムを変更いたしましので、BBSへの書き込みはアカウント登録が必要です。
お手数かけて申し訳ございませんが、登録ページから新規登録をお願いいたします。

For security reasons, we have renewed the AkaiKKR website. Now, you need your account to send a message to BBS. If you do not have an account yet, please register.